mec pre NT yE THE wa WY
> i
ROARD FOR ¢ ORRECTIO 1 OF NAVAL RECORDS
fU1 3. COUR Va Sea >
NL VA 2EEOG-2450
ARLING?TC?
TJR
Docket No: 3397-14
24 November 2014
os
This is in reference to your application For correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 November 2014. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
cordance
of error and injustice were reviewed in a
A
allegations
with administrative regulations and
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material consid
the Board consisted of your application, toge a
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies In addition, the
Board considered the attached advisor} opinion furnished by
Headguarters Marine Corps, a COPY of which is attached for your
intormation.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
errer Or injustice. In this regard,
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory
accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstance® of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board
In this regard, 4t is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records
ntiv, when applying for 4 correct: Liou
pplican
CE smSequents 3
existence of probable material error or ia)
record, the burden is on the a
weer
7 ROBERT 5, "oF —
Executive Director
ustice.
Enclosures
bd
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3828 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO3828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7819 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3321 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC (memo. NR3321-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR550 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, ‘the burden’ is”on the applicant to demonstrate the © existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4576 14
— A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, . In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Administrative Law), dated 24 March 2014, Chief of Naval Personnel, dated 14 October 2014, and Commander, Navy Recruiting Command, dated 26 November 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3857 14
A three-member panel of the Boar@ for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8438 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5588 14
Additionally, the Board considered your response dated 20 Nov 2014. , However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7074 13
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to che proceedings of this Board. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9395 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. s After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...